Fixing It #2 – How About QE Directly To The Public ?!

 

You have to love this guy, Steve Keen.  Here is his 2012 INET Berlin presentation as part of the Instability in Financial Markets 3/5 series.

http://www.youtube.com/embed/js9WBi_ztvg

He has modelled the financial system and is trying to educate economists, politicians and all of us that  in a credit-based economy, there are three sources of aggregate demand, and three ways in which this demand is expended:

1. Demand from income earned by selling goods and services, which primarily finances consumption of goods and services;

2. Demand from rising entrepreneurial debt, which primarily finances investment; and

3. Demand from rising Ponzi debt, which primarily finances the purchase of existing assets.

It is #2 and #3 above where the problem lies as banks are not restricted to endogenously expand the money supply in response to entrepreneurial or Ponzi Finance demands for funds.   Basically banks lend first and look for the reserves second; not the other way around as is taught by traditional economics.    Banks can always borrow the reserves from another bank as needed which appears to be a normal industry practise.

We therefore has two  problems to solve:

1.  IMPROVE THE SYSTEM:  We need to protect ourselves from the growth in endogenous money by banks which allows for the unconstrained growth in borrowed money for Ponzi asset and investment bubbles.  Two such important assets are real estate and company common stocks.

He has the “PILL” constraint to help out in the prevention of a real estate  valuation bubble and ”Jubilee Shares” as the constraint to help out in the prevention of company stock valuation bubbles.  Both interesting concepts.  (Discussed around the 19 minute mark)

2.  RESET THE SYSTEM:  We need to get out of the current debt problem

The solution proposed here is QE given directly to to the public.  How much ?  Not sure.  However if you have personal debts it must be used to pay off those debts and if you do not have debts you get a cash injection and can spend it into the economy or put in the bank for spending later ?!  Thoughts on that ?  Sounds inflationary !?  Just give it to me !

 

 

 

The man’s for `Turning`..??

 

The UK Gov’t has had a bit of a bad time of it lately, and much of the criticism has been directed toward Cameron and Osbourne’s crazy budget proposals of taxing hot food…

watch?v=Rlfa382CaWk&feature=related

This whole fiasco has turned out to be a bit of a disaster for the Government, and goes some way to highlight the desperation felt by those in Downing street, who face ever mounting economic issues.

What really concerns me, is that the Government seem intent on looking for new tax revenues, before they have considered creating/ stimulating new business opportunities, which would in turn, have boosted tax revenues by default….

In part, the answer to the title is Yes, Mr Cameron has shown he can alter his course of action…

Can he admit the austere route he has chosen is a bigger mistake than `Pasty taxes`..??

That I am undecided on..!!

( Also, I would like to add, that I am not included in the “many” who eat a pasty for lunch every day..!! )

Dmitri Orlov’s latest podcast (if anyone is an Orlov fan out there)

scattered throughout this interview are some interesting points the first part is a run through of his famous 5 stages of collapse, followed by some updated thoughts both philosophical and economic, worth a listen.

http://cluborlov.blogspot.co.uk/2012/05/from-alpha-to-omega-podcast.html