Gary gives it a rip

I regretted putting up the first Gary scratch video ….. and now feel obliged to put up his next one.
Basically, I thought it would be funny and that would be the end of it; but hitting Gary is like hitting the tar baby (for people who had a deprived childhood).
Gary is not compatible with the OTP pub; but on many subjects his rebellious mind does come up with some interesting angles.
On the search for what is actually going on in the economic world, I cannot imagine that the possible moments of clarity, could ever outweigh his predilection for just making stuff up.

If we ever get round to thinking about what could replace what we have now, he could be valuable there….maybe. Or, if things go so out of control, that understanding is no longer of any use.

As I write this, I am half persuading myself, that knowing what is happening now is probably of not much use, as the future will be so different ……….. but, I am not going to give in yet.
Gary’s desperation to be right first time, must surely, be a bad way of approaching any problem. I will maintain, that going through the basics, is still the best way to earn a respectable opinion.
It may all turn out to be for nothing as events turn the basics over, but it must be better than just making it up as you go along …… mustn’t it~!?

Tagged . Bookmark the permalink.
  • Lyle

    I stand duly reprimanded as the elitist empty headed asshole that I am. Thanks for the reminder Gary.

    For what it’s worth department – not much – in the past I’ve watched a fair amount of your videos and am one who agrees with many if not all of your views on people and society. You and Nick have apparently enjoyed banter and intellectual sparring for years now. That speaks volumes about both of you. Intellectual giants! ( That should draw a fuck you, you empty headed moran – at minimum. )

    Elitist. Yes – my fundamental cynicism and general irreverance certainly could rightly be felt and described as snobbery. On the other hand there is no short supply of impudence in the midst.I’ve never offered any pretense here about understanding at depth much of what is discussed. I’m just trying to learn a little and maybe hum a few bars. Don’t really give a shit about the lyrics.

    On the other hand, I’ve watched many long winded disertations by leading scholars on economics. And when I get up early in the morning and find someone trying to educate us on the entire ball of wax so to speak, by an impromtu scratching on a piece of paper… well… believe it or not I actually have somewhat of what is often referred to as “a life”.  Lots of friends, a successful business, a wife and 5 cats and I actually help real people in real life in many ways – including financial support.

    OTP is essentially a little entertainment of sorts where I might occasionally learn something. I find there’s some pretty nice and respectable people here and I easily acquiesce to and respect their inherent intelligence.

    Even if I am in fact an empty headed arrogant low life piece of shit who needs to work on getting an icon.
    I’ll attend to that soon. NOT!

    I’m more of an observer of people and life.  I observe a lot more going on here than just economics.

  • joebhed

    Gary

    I got out of the first vid at 3 minutes because of your fractured fairy tale style so I admit there might have been a pearl or two in there.
    I watched this diatribe up to the point where you picked up the pen and wrote ‘deed’ to discus ‘surplus’ where you were obviously trying to deal with “wealth”.

    Why would anyone comment and be subject to another tirade from Gary that Nick would probably post, which was why I abandoned our dialogue years ago.

    It’s hard to argue the ‘facts’, so a couple of observations.
    I agree on the stock market over-valuation, though I think about 5K.

    I don’t agree that is where the “money” is – its in the other things you mentioned, the SIVs, CDSs, CDOs, ABS’s, etc that are held by the shadow/investment bankers, and those guys NEED to take an 80 percent haircut, or fail. The Dow 30 valuation pales compared to the derivatives market.

    The Fed has an intermedial role regarding “cash”.
    It’s printed by Treasury and demanded into circulation by the private bankers as needed.
    The Fed pays the cost of printing but only turns it over to the bank as a debt.
    But, so what?

    To me, the so what is that proves that ALL the money comes into existence as a debt.
    Coins excepted.
    Even the cash.  
    Knowing your penchant for attacking interest as slavery, I could never understand why you defend fractional-reserve banking, when FRB is the vehicle for creating all that interest-bearing debt into existence.

    As to Keen, he seemed trying to join the MMTers on the importance of the fact that banks can acquire reserves post-fact as if to debunk ‘the money -multiplier-myth’.
    I have pointed out to Steve and other MMTers that this is exactly the way that the Fed has explained the money-multiplier for 50 years, regardless of what may be taught in economics class.
    So, its a distinction without a difference.
    Keen and others claim that therefore we do not have fractional-reserve banking.
    And therefrom we do not NEED to change this system.
    I disagree.

    So, I’m one who does put the facts out there.
    I do have about 200 videos on my perspective on what is wrong and what NEEDs to be done to fix it.
    And I still, after all these years, don’t agree with Gary.

    But, keep on keepin’ on.

    Ouch!  I can feel it coming.
    Please prove me wrong.

  • lgrinaker

    I didn’t want to hear him rip into me, so I stopped listening fairly early on.

    I do know that in feeling that I had a general grasp of a few things (both new to me over the past couple of years, and both working to break from convention), I had neglected the nitty gritty fundamental operations of them, both with MMT and with what I took as a basic banking statement of Keens (and others) that banks create loans and deposits and look for reserves later.  He also wanted to point out that it’s incorrect to look at banks simply as facilitators for the “patient person” (with a deposit of money in the bank that he is in no hurry to use) and the “inpatient person.”

    And much of what he went on to present (in various presentations and formats) was making a lot of sense to me about how much the inflation in the money supply due to this private debt, say, in comparison to the federal govt. debt, is playing a far more significant role (even though we mostly only hear the conventional stuff — that I’ve been learning from the likes of MMTers, is just not correct — about the govt. debt that’s “going to bring us all down;” that we’re just like Greece, etc.).  And because this private debt *requires* repayment/unwinding (very different than govt. debt), it’s clearly going to be the cause of tremendous turmoil as it unwinds, which it must (a process that has certainly started, but as Keen makes clear, still has a very long way to go). 

    And I was enjoying just “going with that,” and the further stuff I was learning from him, and I guess I still can to some extent, whether or not I have a grasp of the fundamental operations, of how it works.

    Yep, I have become very much like a 5 year old (why not stay with 5s?) in starting with the very basics of banking operations and balance sheets (which I have next to no experience with), and nope, that isn’t very comfortable, especially when I manage to struggle with it.  But so be it.  That’s where I am.  I’m not going to pretend that I understand something that I know I don’t, even if an average 5 year old should, ;-).

    But I also know that when I do get a better grasp of this nitty gritty fundamental level of things, I’ll feel a lot better about the “higher level” of the stuff I’m learning (and am, frankly, of course, far more interested in).

    ~~~~

    I will say this, though, I respect Gary’s way of expressing that he is upset with someone(s) far more than I respect what the resident “imposter” had been doing lately.  In comparing the two, I’d take Gary’s way any day.  Gary had some stuff he wanted to say, and he made a video on his own channel, which people could watch or not watch.  And he expressed very directly what he wanted to complain about.  And hey, I, too, took part in a mocking post, so it’s not surprising to me that Gary wanted to hit back.  (And I’m sure Mystic wasn’t too happy with being mocked originally by Gary.)

    Posting Gary’s response today, though, was done with a clear change of tone.  In that, it seems like it wasn’t done as a way to mock Gary, but as a way to let him have his say in response to yesterday’s post.  So with that, maybe we can begin to move on, at least beyond the “getting personal” stuff of these exchanges.

    Linda

    • http://overthepeak.com/wordpress/ Mystic

       Girly …. Girly ….. Girly~!

      • lgrinaker

        That and almost all of my comments are just way, way too frickin’ *long* – for me as a reader too!  I just did it again within another thread, ;-).  (I know, I know…) 

        I’ve got to remember, not everything that comes to mind via these things has to be written all at once.  (I’ll work on that, ;-).)

        Plus, I’ve *got* to leave (and obviously haven’t yet)!

        Linda

    • http://profile.yahoo.com/4NDOXV5SA35DXJ4S3XLGMWO6LM Bob

      Don’t worry, he’s more concerned with the comments rather than the actual video. 

  • snedmeister1

    I thought owning a `share` in a company, meant you were effectively a part owner…??
    Was that wrong of me..??

    • http://overthepeak.com/wordpress/ Mystic

       I’ll tell you what he meant, because it is vaguely interesting.
      By some miracle Gary guessed the `physical` value of American companies. (I know it was a guess because the figures are very rarely used).  For `physical value` I mean, the value of all the physical saleable stuff that belongs to the company (factories, vans, whatever).  It is about 3% over the SnP500.  The rest of the `value` is future cash flow / profits.

      So, what Gary is saying is they only own 3% of now value and 97% of future value.

      • snedmeister1

        Is owning a Bond issued by a company any different, in that respect..??
        ( Or are you technically just lending them the cash )

        • http://overthepeak.com/wordpress/ Mystic

           Yes, you own nothing …. in fact, you risk losing your money if things go bad (with no upside over the interest on the bond).

  • CSArichardo

    I like the concept that company’s do not pay their employees, the customer does.  That requires all of us to think alittle !